"The Jewish case against voting for Barack Obama" - video and articles

Watch syndicated columnist, Ben Shapiro's 3-part video (introduced first in its Preview) in which he presents concerns about the Obamania that is sweeping the nation.

The program examines Obama's advisors, friends, running mate, and own words. Part I (sequentially follows trailer, or is selectable from 2nd Menu Button) covers the introduction and explores his advisors. Then view Parts II and III for his friends, running mate, public statements, and summary.



Particularly important is Barack Obama's team's worrying ideology that America's War on Terror would be better served by handing the Islamists a hostile state in the midst of a bi-sected Israel; and the Obama-team's plan to reprioritize American policy to ally with Islamism - and against Jewish interests in preserving the safety of the Jewish refuge of Israel.

Worthwhile viewing for anyone concerned about the reprioritizing of US policy away from assuring Israel's safety and towards emboldening global Islamism by increasing Iranian regional and global hegemony by attempting to appease the belligerent, Islamist States of Iran and Saudi Arabia, through Obama's team with those self-declared intentions.

Journalist Ed Lasky of American Thinker has detailed many concerns about the anti-Israel character of Obama and his choices for his administration - (in January '08- even before he pulled Robert Malley and Samantha Powers from campaign visibility).
Obama's soothing and inspiring oratory sometimes vanishes when he talks of the Middle East. Indeed, his off-the-cuff remarks have been uniformly taken by supporters of Israel as signs that the inner Obama does not truly support Israel despite what his canned speeches and essays may contain.

Now that Obama has become a leading Presidential candidate, he has assembled a body of foreign policy advisers who signal that a President Obama would likely have an approach towards Israel radically at odds with those of previous Presidents (both Republican and Democrat). A group of experts collected by the Israeli liberal newspaper Haaretz deemed him to be the candidate likely to be least supportive of Israel. He is the candidate most favored by the Arab-American community. ...

Obama has, on his own volition, assembled his networks of friends, mentors, financial supporters and foreign policy advisers. In his judgment -- a judgment that he regularly trumpets as being superior to others - these people are worthy of advising him. There are among those friends and advisers key people who seem to display a great deal of antipathy towards the American-Israel relationshipRead it all

American Thinker lists other sources which document concerns about the Obama's team's anti-Israelism:

Those concerned about Obama and Israel include (click original for links):

Former Israel Ambassador to America Daniel Ayalon (Who Are You Barack Obama?) wherein the Ambassador expressed concern regarding Obama's approach toward Iran and also, based on his own personal experience with Obama dealing on issues concerning the American-Israel relationship, stating that he was left with an "impression that he was not entirely forthright with his thinking";

Jerusalem Post columnist Caroline Glick, who also took on Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul in this column;

Jerusalem Post Editorial Page editor Saul Singer (Obama's Mixed Record on Iran );

The New York Post; Writer Hillel Halkin (Obama Gets Israel Wrong);

An American Jewish Committee internal memo questioned Obama's potential approach to Middle East policy;

Commentary Magazine writer Noah Pollak criticized Obama's appointment of Robert Malley and Samantha Power as foreign policy advisers. Pollak notes in a recent post that Power (a key and very public foreign adviser to Senator Obama) echoes the views of Zbigniew Brezenski in calling for "special interest groups" influence over foreign policy to be abolished. Power has also called for the elimination of foreign aid to Israel and its redirection to "Palestine", as well as the massive imposition of US military forces in the area to bring about and enforce a settlement (where, of course, they could find themselves easy targets and be subject to propaganda attacks as another imperial foray into the Middle East).

The blog Powerline has also raised questions regarding Obama;

Slate magazine writer Mickey Kaus has long wondered why Obama and his close relationship with Pastor Wright has all but escaped any media scrutiny and has pointed out that Wright's racial divisiveness is in sharp contrast to Obama's campaign mantra of unity. Many other very credible commentators have raised these issues and others. Yet critics of Lasky's articles have all but ignored the criticism arising from these quarters.

Now why do we bring these people into the discussion? To show that there are serious questions that a wide variety of commentators, including a former Ambassador, have regarding Barack Obama and Israel.

3 comments:

A Veteran said...

Imagine for a few moments that you are the human
resources director of a major multi-billion dollar
corporation. You are sitting in your large,
luxurious office when you receive a phone call from
the Chairman of the Board of Directors.

He tells you that the board is considering a
candidate for a high-level executive position. He
advises you to complete a thorough background
investigation and have it to him within 10 days.

You immediately call the private detective agency
you have used for years and give them the name and
address of the prospective candidate, along with the
deadline for a high level security clearance.

Your next move is to call your assistant to your
office, giving him/her the candidate's personal
information along with instructions to 'do your
standard beginning background checks.'

Preliminary findings begin landing in your fax
machine on the third day.

* Your candidate has used more than one name.

* His original birth certificate is unavailable, and


* he was mentored during his youth by a high level
communist in Hawaii.

* You receive a 3 page 'dossier' on Frank Marshall
Davis.

* You also learn the candidate was proctored into an
elite Eastern private university by a middle eastern
Muslim.

* You receive a short dossier on Khalid al-Mansour.

* You learn the candidate has terrorist organization
'Nations of Islam' employees on his current staff,
and one of his advisers is a member of the global
terrorist group 'Muslim Brotherhood.'

On day four, you receive in the mail from the
security agency two books the candidate has written.


You read both books, highlighting the anti-American,
anti-white racist passages. You note the admissions
of drug use.

You also receive in the packet a copy of the bitter
anti-white thesis his wife wrote as a college
undergraduate.

You receive a 4 page fax on the candidate's
relative, Raila Odinga, who is connected with brutal
Muslim politics in Africa, and background
information on the candidate's estranged father who
was part of Kenya's most corrupt regime.

The fifth day brings to your special delivery mail

* the complete background on Bill Ayers; his
association with your candidate, his FBI criminal
record, and

* a copy of the book 'Rules for Radicals' written by
communist Saul Alinsky.

* You are advised your candidate used tactics from
'Rules for Radicals' at his previous employment.

* You are advised the candidate's wife used an
excerpt from this book during a recent speech.

You receive by fax, a background on A.C.O.R.N. and
an alert

* that this group is being watched by the U.S.
Department of Justice and other state and local law
enforcement agencies.

* You learn your candidate is endorsed by every
Muslim terrorist organization on Earth; that he
holds Muslim beliefs.

* His friend, Louis Farrakhan, is head of Nations of
Islam
.
* You learn that the candidate's pastor met with
global terrorist Mohmmar Gaddafi in Libya, along
with their mutual friend and anti-American Louis
Farrakhan.

* You receive printed transcripts of his pastor's
anti-White, anti-American 'sermons' and are advised
your candidate has been close personal friends with
this 'pastor' for two decades.

* Your candidate has referred to this radical pastor
as his 'personal spiritual adviser,' and in fact,
the title of one of your candidates memoirs was
inspired by a line from this pastor's 'sermons.'

In your fax machine on the sixth morning is

* a file on one Tony Rezko; his friendship,
associations and business transactions with your
candidate, as well as high level 'people' of middle
eastern origin, and his federal conviction.

You will spend most of day seven compiling a file on
the candidate, The Obama File , complete with
footnotes and cross references.
Additional information is arriving regarding the
candidate's friends and acquaintances during
college, and you learn that

* he did not run with a mainstream crowd, but chose
radicals and communist agitators for his social
group.

The morning of the eighth day has arrived and you
and your assistant have placed a small mountain of
background information into manageable 'piles'
including

* photographs of the candidate's family in Africa,

* he and George Soros (including a brief file on the
Soros 'Open Society Institute'),

* photos of the candidate and Louis Farrakhan and
anti-Israel Arafat adviser Edward Said.

You begin to outline and write your 'Summary
Evaluation' to the Chairman of the Board of
Directors:

* This candidate has a tissue thin work experience
resume.

* He has not managed large groups of personnel,
departments, material, or P&L statements.

* This candidate's own writing exhibits a
deep-seeded anger and resentment towards people of
the Caucasian race over the issue of slavery.

* His emotional gravitas is centered upon his
African heritage, and his belief that the white man
is responsible for global poverty and unequal
sharing of wealth.

* The candidate's personal associations since
childhood have been mostly with radical African
Americans, Muslims, and communists; those who harbor
anger towards The United States of America.

* Particularly disturbing is his lengthy
relationship with Bill Ayers, an unrepentant
Weatherman radical who bombed government buildings
and abdicated the overthrow of the United States.

* Given the current global situation of nearly
twelve thousand Muslim acts of terrorism since 911,
it is disturbing to find his close associations with
Muslim groups


* I have highlighted passages in both books and find
one particularly disturbing: 'Should the political
winds shift in an ugly direction I will side with
the Muslims.'

* The candidate has surrounded himself with
anti-American grievance mongers, and appears to
manipulate 'typical white people' by appealing to
their guilt about slavery.

* He is a socialist, and totally disenfranchised
from the history of 'root America.'

* The candidate refuses to discuss his years at
Columbia University, although he lived off campus
and made few friends.

* He will not release his application to the state
bar notes which raises questions on several issues
including the use of drugs.

* Very little is available about his experience with
the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a foundation that
spent $100 million with no discernible benefit for
the schools and students that it was putatively
designed to help

It is therefore my strongest recommendation this
candidate not be considered for any position within
the corporation.


Do your own research and come to your own conclusions

Anonymous said...

You have done an excellent, thourough research job. I hope that everyone who read this will send it to everyone they know.
He is also very involved with Acorn which is has destroyed true democracy by creating thousands of false voters. This is one of the biggest problems we have right now. Our elections are now representative of the people.

Anonymous said...

Continuation of comment above...The last sentence should read "Our elections are NOT representative of our people". Sorry that I sent it before proofreading it.
Logically, doesn't it seem to you that as our future president candidate, who swears to protect and defend the constitution against enemies foreign and DOMESTIC, that Obama would want to investigate this voter fraud. Read this quote."http://www.onenewsnow.com/Election2008/Default.aspx?id=297446
"Lawyers for the Obama campaign have written U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, asking him to delay any investigations of voter fraud until after the election. The Obama campaign's general counsel, Robert Bauer, says the FBI should instead be investigating those who have lodged complaints of voter registration fraud against groups like ACORN."
WHAT????????????????
IF AMERICANS WANT TO INVESTIGATE VOTER FRAUD, OBAMA SAYS THEY SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED?
ARE WE BECOMING A FASCIST COUNTRY?????????????